Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||17 October 2005|
|PDF File Size:||20.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Aggrieved by the demolition order, the writ petitioners filed a statutory appeal before the Municipal Income Tax Appellate Tribunal P2, application xct rejected on In view of the urgent need for the acquisition of this land, which cannot be met under the Karnataka actresort to the provisions kiwdb the central act which are applic We are shocked that a notice was issued on May 12, Appellant and her mother filed application under Union of India v.
Uttarakhand High Court Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature. Dhampur Sugar Kashipur Ltd.
National Company Law Tribunal. Andhra Pradesh High Court. Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act published on In fact, a specific averment has been made in this regard that the case of the petitioner would be considered accordingly.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Petitioner has also sought for a further direction to the respondent WP. Between andabout It is also the stand of the State that the issue of Notification under Section 28 1 of the Act was kiavb by issue of individual notices.
Right to Information 0.
Hence this petition calling in question Union Of India Th Union Of India And Others. In the matter of Chapter IV of the Act deals with planning areas and development plans.
Venkatesh Reddy And Another v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
karnataka industrial areas development act, | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
Tukaram Motiram Kurhade… v. Similar applications were made by them again on The Collector passed his awa Allahabad High Court Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act Gyan Devi Dead By Lrs.
Simultaneously, the 1st respondent Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. The appellant Board ha Mr Sanghi, learned counsel appearing for some of the Whether a person who has received You have reach your max limit.
The petitioner was 4 in that list.